Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Christine the Strawberry Girl's avatar

Although, I have come along way since the start of this planned-demic. From your average demoRATic voter and completely unaware of conspiracies I was definitely duped at every turn. Yes I got 2 shots, against my will but also didn’t look into my rights so I recognize now that I was settling in on being the victim. Blaming rather than taking responsibility for my life and health. I still struggle with this. Im forever a work in progress. Thankfully (kinda) I got sick from the second shot hours afterwards which made me realize my grave mistake. It at least sent me on a journey to discover the shocking truths....which did bring me to the IVM, which I took for a little while. Coming to the conclusion that all pHARMaceuticals have an agenda that is designed to keep us down. Discovothat even the “truths” need discernment. Since finding you, Dr. Cowan, Dr. Kaufman, Dr. Lanka, the Baileys, and all the out of the box thinker’s I’m starting to recognize the controllers’ patterns and that my mind and body are capable of so much healing, if treated correctly. I’m not going to say I’ve completely broken free from my dungeon programming but I’m at least recognizing when I’m diverting into fear based thinking and practicing the better frequency instead. I’m excited to learn and work on finding who I really am in this world and how the world really works. TY!💖

Expand full comment
Roger Wagent, curmudgeon's avatar

Hello.

I think what you are talking about here is called, in other contexts, the "switcheroo."

We want to poison you with the killshots, but you are too smart and won't take it, we use reverse psychology to tell you not to take IVM, then you run like crazy for IVM, because all your heroes of the resistance are promoting it, but, here comes the switcheroo, IVM produces similar effects that we wanted to cause with the killshots you won't take.

It is impossible to talk people about this possibility because there is a strong barrier based on fear and pride. The fear that the people you look up to have betrayed you, again, and the pride that there is an easy and cheap solution to that terrible disease that is covid (NOT!) and as stkirsch said, all humans took IVM for one month, the transmission of the virus would stop and covid would be over (he said that or something very similar, but my memory may be wrong.)

So all the emotional, social, cultural and economic damage (all objectives of this war) could have been avoided if there had been no censorship of IVM. That is what we believe. Maybe we are wrong again?

We are very well educated consumers. Very trusting. If there is a disease, there has to be one simple cure. Inexpensive, accessible and one that does not require much effort to use. The pill. Even a sachet of powder to be dissolved in water is too much effort. We ant pills!

The doctors say there are no cures for anything. Pills, and anything else, only suppress symptoms at best. And cause other symptoms, but they cannot say that or won't say that.

Why they say that Samuel Hanhemann died very wealthy? They say it was because he sold many useless *cures* to many willing costumers, and that is a shame because charlatans outside the government should not get rich. Only charlatans inside the government should become wealthy. That is: money gained outside the framework of public institution forcing people to consume things they don't want, has no merit at all.

Imagine Harry. Harry is an entrepreneur of nature medicine. He sells home made pure gum spirits of turpentine to willing costumers, that come to him searching for a cure for parasites. Harry has not go to hunt down the costumers and drag them to his store. He just throws harmless publicity, that is censored or very much frowned down: If you want a cure, come to my store.

Hypothetical Harry is very transparent about his methods of production of his turpentine. He also explains that this treatment require patience and determination. He explains adverse events that may happen, and what to do if that happens. He explains the need to use other things, such as clean water, in the deparasitation process. He is such a helpful entrepreneur that he will present his costumers with a booklet that explains everything.

Hypothetical Harry is having great success and he is earning a lot of money. The people from the pharmacy notice fewer clients coming. They get angry. They denounce Harry to the authorities that regulate commerce: "Harry is selling a real cure and is destroying our jobs. Make him stop!"

That is the "creative destruction of capitalism." How freedom to choose your way will destroy the bad businesses. It seems that only a strong protection racket, paid with taxpayer money, can prevent the creative destruction from taking place.

The problem is that those who benefit from free market capitalism will become fearful of losing their position of dominance, and will desire regulation to fend off the danger of losing to new competition that offers an even better product.

People like free market when it's beneficial to their interests, and they betray the spirit of the free market when it becomes a threat to their interests.

Like PCB's. People used die intoxicated with coal burning because they didn't like to die from cold temperature, and they only had wood and coal to burn and keep warm. Then electricity was invented. People now have a new way to keep warm, that solve the problem of breathing dirty air. But the plastics (PCB) used to insulate electrical components are toxic in another way. They contaminate the water and then the land, and then all the food is problematic. Well, maybe not all the food. Only the food that is produced near the contamination spot. Which may be a big area.

Normally someone would come up with an idea to correct the problem. But that would have created problems for the new empires of electricity. Entrepreneurs are not allowed near an established industry.

If we close our eyes for 100 years, then the problem will solve itself, right. I mean, people will get used to it. Like, having an epidemic of weird cancers that used to be super rare. That may be caused by contamination.

"Well, you see, that is impossible," say the spin doctors. "Ackkkkshually, there was always many cancers, but there were no methods of diagnosing them so the statistics show a false effect of growth in cancer diagnosis that seems, falsely, to correspond to new cancers. Perish that though. You are being silly and paranoid. If the authorities say there is no problem, then there is no problem."

That is how many some people think. They are biased to think that a complicated argument based on a statistical fallacy explains away all the problems they refuse to acknowledge.

Or, they would say, there was fewer cancers before because people didn't live long enough to develop them. They died in wars and terrible epidemics because there was no vaccines. People who die in their 20s, 30s, 40s, don't get to reproduce or their offspring may died before becoming adults and all that hinders the growth of population. Also, those dead people will not have cancer. That is a way to end the shameful cancer epidemic of today. We only need to go back to our old and traditional ways of having wars all the time, with conscription of people and confiscation of land and food for the armies, causing famines. That makes so much sense than the current system of having wars all the time in other countries and poisoning our own people to keep the growth down.

Then, the most important aspect to all this is that all solutions must be nipped in the bud. As Thomas Sowell reasoned "There are no solutions, only compromises." Which actually means that if someone were to find a way of creating electricity 100 times cheaper than today and without contamination, such that heavy industry (steel) would begin using electricity instead of coal, thus creatively destroying the carbon and petrol industry, which would make more expensive the production of petrol derived chemicals; then we have to make the compromise of keeping up the system even if that means wreaking havoc everywhere. Solutions must not be allowed, not once, not ever, in anything.

Too good to be true. It is probably false. Like the idea that all contagious diseases caused by microbes were invented to never discover and then solve the problems of contamination. It has to be false. Otherwise, we would be even worse than we think we are.

The great cover up.

Curiously enough, this cover up also benefits the ecologists and the natural health practitioners. They also want a stable business. They want power over humans, too. Like normal doctors. They need to control information and to scare people to keep them bound, so that they never seek a solution. There are no easy solutions allowed in environmentalism or in natural medicine. Otherwise, people would flourish and become free, making our business unpredictable. And there would be a growth in human population, which is bad for the environment by definition. Environment good humans bad!

The corrupt side of the natural health world and ecologism or environmentalism benefits, parasitically, of the corruption of the system. Fortunately enough, the system wants to kill them too. There can be no competition. The system is following a deparasitation protocol.

From a Plutonian perspective, this is all a lot of fun. The people who want to heal the world and make everyone free seem to be working for the enemy, and they don't know about it.

If my reasoning in this extra-long comment are correct, then the subconscious sabotage and self-sabotage present in the victims of covid tyranny, me included, is one of the things that keep people anesthesized. What homeopathic preparation could I use to heal that sabotage, I wonder.

My tribe will not believe me when I tell them that their beloved IVM was another con. My compassionate side tells me "Don't say a word. They are already irritated about the possibility growing in their thinking that SARS and COVID may have never been real. Let them process that slowly. Nothing to win." I think that's my Venus and my Pallas in Pisces advising my Mars in Scorpio to be prudent.

Maybe I choose to believe again in covid and ivm and the rebel doctors. That seems to be an easier life. The blue pill for Cipher. But I don't like to betray people, as Cipher did in the Matrix. I only like to study humans betraying each other, as someone who enjoys studying a work of art.

In reality, all the corruption of humans can be studied as a work of art. Treason is a theme that repeats too much. I prefer to study other forms of corruption, like sophistry and war. There is no much treason in sophistry and war, because the participants distrust each other ab initio.

Expand full comment
87 more comments...

No posts