The Ivermectin Double Cross
It's like sprinkles, but from the Government!
Since 1998, I have been studying and experiencing in various manners the nature doctor path. I bloomed into visual arts as a child. I was a writer. I danced. Then my calling came. First, I began with the study of animals, then of plants and man. In nature and in the lab. Then chemical and mathematical, which taught me the natural methods of synergy and helped me train my pattern recognition. Then 15 years of clinical experience, designing medicine, and authoring a book (as a single parent). 11 years as an entrepreneur and ongoing. I had many years of studying my inner world. I trained in many disciplines. Red flags jump out at me. The Ivermectin double-cross story was simple for me to spot soon into it, akin to the plandemic on day one.
What is the double-cross? You can watch a video of me explaining how the slave manipulators pull off the double-cross. They know we are going to figure some things out about their agenda, but they have traps for us every step of the way. They were very well aware there would be those of us able to see through their overt cons, but they planned otherwise for us. Hold back the candy for long enough, the child will want it. Make it look like they are suppressing a “cure” for a disease (one that doesn’t even exist, for a more modern example) and those clever monkeys are going to start going bananas over it. They know how to manipulate a rebel mind. This is why there are so many gatekeepers and controlled opposition. The plan is to give you enough to think you know what’s going on, hoping you will stop your searching there, as they play the law of averages knowing that most people will stay trapped in a narrative they tailored all along.
You can like and do whatever you wish, of course. I am presenting an educated perspective other than the one you may have been listening to. I place ivermectin in the same arena as I do antibiotics. These are things that are designed to kill some sort of life inside of us. Mankind is always so heavy-handed with chemicals! Why must everything be bombed and eradicated? Obliterated?
Has anyone ever stopped to ask what all these drug residues from stool may do once they hit our rivers and lakes; once they are in our wildlife? Antibiotics cause water and soil contamination. Does Ivermectin? Indeed, it does. The residue can kill insects, too. Also, it was found ivermectin breakdown takes months in cold weather, but faster (2 weeks) in hot weather. What happens when more and more people take this drug, believing it to be some sort of miracle?
A major mistake in our understanding is we don't realize that what we are calling parasite infections are all indicators, telling us something important about the health of our entire organism: the frequencies and signals it puts off. Calling out for a need to be met.
The controllers of "scienceTM" have no desire to fund such studies to test if our own signals call to us these situations so that we can metabolize something synthetic or express something emotionally (release) that has happened to us from our exposures and unfit habits. We look at these situations as if unwanted, rather than understand that they actually have a purpose, one that is meant for your ultimate benefit.
This understanding completely accepts the benevolence of the intent of our body's healing elegance and completely flips the picture about how we are in constant communication with our surroundings in a non-material manner, one that we have barely been allowed to explore (controlled knowledge). It alters our thinking about the world, as well as, places responsibility firmly in our own laps.
I understand that once meddled, usually always meddled, and there will be situations of the drug leading to a dependency on it, so those people will use it for life. Those who are talked into chemo can use it alongside their treatments and, if lucky, score a few extra months or years of life with their cancer suppression. I also understand there can be metabolic problems with parasites, almost akin to an allergy, that is when there is a signaling of a “spill on aisle 4” that it is not handling the clean up so well with limited energetic resources to do so.
This is foundationally a problem of detox and if that were addressed, their symptoms would subside, and they would be metabolizing the parasitic wastes well (which are eating their highly toxic stores that have yet been able to be metabolized by anything else in the body). Primarily, the detox correction would be made with supplementation, while food and other lifestyle changes are being sorted out over time, and to build up reserves from depletion, unblock the meridians to prioritize proper cleansing. I have helped thousands of people successfully work with this method.
There are many environmental toxins that can accumulate in the human body and these are just a small few:
Lead: Found in old paint, contaminated soil, and drinking water.
Mercury: Found in seafood, dental fillings, and certain industrial processes.
Cadmium: Found in batteries, pigments, and some types of soil.
Arsenic: Found in water, soil, and some foods, found in old lace and some textiles.
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): These are synthetic chemicals that were once widely used in electrical equipment and are now banned in many countries.
Dioxins: Toxic byproducts of some industrial processes, such as waste incineration and pesticide manufacturing.
Pesticides/Herbicides: Can accumulate in food and water, and damage soils.
Bisphenol A (BPA): Used in the production of certain plastics and resins and can leach into food and drinks stored in these materials.
Phthalates: Chemicals used in the production of plastics and personal care products, and can disrupt hormones and cause other health problems.
Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs): These are synthetic “forever” chemicals used in nonstick cookware, waterproof clothing, and fire-fighting foam, and are persistent in the environment and can accumulate in the body.
Studies have found that parasites like tapeworms can accumulate high levels of lead, cadmium, and mercury, in higher concentrations than their hosts can, indicating that they are capable of absorbing and retaining these toxic substances from their hosts. When you kill these creatures, the body reabsorbs the wastes back into the tissues. We do a disservice to ourselves to go on a killing spree inside of our bodies at the expense of the terrain.
I suppose there will be no vegans taking ivermectin then since that philosophy is all about the preservation and respect of all sentient living things. Here is another problem you may wish to avoid that can happen when you come in, guns a-blazin’:
“Ivermectin exerts a strong microfilaricidal effect on filariae, leading to a destruction of mf within one week after treatment. In subjects infected with Onchocerca volvulus, the destruction of mf in the skin is associated with inflammatory processes leading to the so-called Mazzotti reaction. In those infected with L. loa, the drug probably induces a paralysis of the L. loa mf, which are then drained passively in the blood circulation. If the microfilarial density is high, the process can lead to an embolization of mf in the brain capillaries, to inflammatory reactions at the cerebral level, and to an encephalopathy.”
There is a choice to chase out (not kill) parasites. MMS is excellent for that (I don't see governments and huge industries handing CDS/MMS out like they do the anti-fertility ivermectin), DMSO and MSM together, as well, simple coffee enemas, correct pH, also, but we are aware when we cleanse them, you are now in charge of their job. You'd best know what you are going after and how. I like to simply start with a metals cleansing routine (various clays and minerals) a few times a year to prevent me from needing parasites to try and do the work for me.
What happens, if those wastes just stay within you? How could that affect your health? Longevity? What if you killed the parasites with ivermectin, what happens to your signaling and frequency from taking this drug? How does it affect your somatids? I’ve never seen such a safety study like that done. What happens when the drug weakens your kidneys (part of your "essence" in TCM describing energy flows in the body)? The kidney is where important energy emerges for many aspects of fertility. Are people taking the drug having their liver, heart, or kidney health monitored? Shouldn’t that be the responsibility of a doctor that is supposed to be specific in drug administration, as it is a drug that carries a heavy potential for side effects?
Are we really sure we haven’t been double-crossed on the ivermectin saga?
I hope this stimulates your thinking and assists your self-reflection productively.
Where we are heading leads to further ideas/thoughts/actions toward our relationship with water, aether, a clean pineal, using frequency to heal, advancement into sovereign thinking, and finding a harmonious collective that isn't forced, natural law learned. The entire way we think about health is correcting itself.
Our better choices will disallow controllers to drug us and manipulate us. We will not be owned.
I surrender myself daily to The Unified Creator and offer this in service,
With love, Amandha
Further learning:
Spacebusters on Ivermectin
👇👇👇
https://www.bitchute.com/video/3GGjYlLVqP4g/
Ivermectin Toxicity: P-Glycoprotein Deficiency 👇👇👇
Amandha explains her perspective found in YumNaturals Emporium Telegram channel.
👇👇 👇
Part 1
https://t.me/amandhavollmer/4009
Part 2
https://t.me/amandhavollmer/4010
And also this 👇👇👇
https://t.me/healthydoseoftruth/241960
Amandha's blog post 👇👇👇
https://yummy.doctor/blog/a-note-about-ivermectin-and-hydroxychloroquine/
Subtle Poisons article 👇👇👇
https://www.swiftrunnerministries.com/Subtle-Poisons.php
Andrew Kaufman MD 👇👇👇
https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/videos/ivermectin-the-true-story-by-dr-andrew-kaufman/
Substack article 👇👇👇
Although, I have come along way since the start of this planned-demic. From your average demoRATic voter and completely unaware of conspiracies I was definitely duped at every turn. Yes I got 2 shots, against my will but also didn’t look into my rights so I recognize now that I was settling in on being the victim. Blaming rather than taking responsibility for my life and health. I still struggle with this. Im forever a work in progress. Thankfully (kinda) I got sick from the second shot hours afterwards which made me realize my grave mistake. It at least sent me on a journey to discover the shocking truths....which did bring me to the IVM, which I took for a little while. Coming to the conclusion that all pHARMaceuticals have an agenda that is designed to keep us down. Discovothat even the “truths” need discernment. Since finding you, Dr. Cowan, Dr. Kaufman, Dr. Lanka, the Baileys, and all the out of the box thinker’s I’m starting to recognize the controllers’ patterns and that my mind and body are capable of so much healing, if treated correctly. I’m not going to say I’ve completely broken free from my dungeon programming but I’m at least recognizing when I’m diverting into fear based thinking and practicing the better frequency instead. I’m excited to learn and work on finding who I really am in this world and how the world really works. TY!💖
Hello.
I think what you are talking about here is called, in other contexts, the "switcheroo."
We want to poison you with the killshots, but you are too smart and won't take it, we use reverse psychology to tell you not to take IVM, then you run like crazy for IVM, because all your heroes of the resistance are promoting it, but, here comes the switcheroo, IVM produces similar effects that we wanted to cause with the killshots you won't take.
It is impossible to talk people about this possibility because there is a strong barrier based on fear and pride. The fear that the people you look up to have betrayed you, again, and the pride that there is an easy and cheap solution to that terrible disease that is covid (NOT!) and as stkirsch said, all humans took IVM for one month, the transmission of the virus would stop and covid would be over (he said that or something very similar, but my memory may be wrong.)
So all the emotional, social, cultural and economic damage (all objectives of this war) could have been avoided if there had been no censorship of IVM. That is what we believe. Maybe we are wrong again?
We are very well educated consumers. Very trusting. If there is a disease, there has to be one simple cure. Inexpensive, accessible and one that does not require much effort to use. The pill. Even a sachet of powder to be dissolved in water is too much effort. We ant pills!
The doctors say there are no cures for anything. Pills, and anything else, only suppress symptoms at best. And cause other symptoms, but they cannot say that or won't say that.
Why they say that Samuel Hanhemann died very wealthy? They say it was because he sold many useless *cures* to many willing costumers, and that is a shame because charlatans outside the government should not get rich. Only charlatans inside the government should become wealthy. That is: money gained outside the framework of public institution forcing people to consume things they don't want, has no merit at all.
Imagine Harry. Harry is an entrepreneur of nature medicine. He sells home made pure gum spirits of turpentine to willing costumers, that come to him searching for a cure for parasites. Harry has not go to hunt down the costumers and drag them to his store. He just throws harmless publicity, that is censored or very much frowned down: If you want a cure, come to my store.
Hypothetical Harry is very transparent about his methods of production of his turpentine. He also explains that this treatment require patience and determination. He explains adverse events that may happen, and what to do if that happens. He explains the need to use other things, such as clean water, in the deparasitation process. He is such a helpful entrepreneur that he will present his costumers with a booklet that explains everything.
Hypothetical Harry is having great success and he is earning a lot of money. The people from the pharmacy notice fewer clients coming. They get angry. They denounce Harry to the authorities that regulate commerce: "Harry is selling a real cure and is destroying our jobs. Make him stop!"
That is the "creative destruction of capitalism." How freedom to choose your way will destroy the bad businesses. It seems that only a strong protection racket, paid with taxpayer money, can prevent the creative destruction from taking place.
The problem is that those who benefit from free market capitalism will become fearful of losing their position of dominance, and will desire regulation to fend off the danger of losing to new competition that offers an even better product.
People like free market when it's beneficial to their interests, and they betray the spirit of the free market when it becomes a threat to their interests.
Like PCB's. People used die intoxicated with coal burning because they didn't like to die from cold temperature, and they only had wood and coal to burn and keep warm. Then electricity was invented. People now have a new way to keep warm, that solve the problem of breathing dirty air. But the plastics (PCB) used to insulate electrical components are toxic in another way. They contaminate the water and then the land, and then all the food is problematic. Well, maybe not all the food. Only the food that is produced near the contamination spot. Which may be a big area.
Normally someone would come up with an idea to correct the problem. But that would have created problems for the new empires of electricity. Entrepreneurs are not allowed near an established industry.
If we close our eyes for 100 years, then the problem will solve itself, right. I mean, people will get used to it. Like, having an epidemic of weird cancers that used to be super rare. That may be caused by contamination.
"Well, you see, that is impossible," say the spin doctors. "Ackkkkshually, there was always many cancers, but there were no methods of diagnosing them so the statistics show a false effect of growth in cancer diagnosis that seems, falsely, to correspond to new cancers. Perish that though. You are being silly and paranoid. If the authorities say there is no problem, then there is no problem."
That is how many some people think. They are biased to think that a complicated argument based on a statistical fallacy explains away all the problems they refuse to acknowledge.
Or, they would say, there was fewer cancers before because people didn't live long enough to develop them. They died in wars and terrible epidemics because there was no vaccines. People who die in their 20s, 30s, 40s, don't get to reproduce or their offspring may died before becoming adults and all that hinders the growth of population. Also, those dead people will not have cancer. That is a way to end the shameful cancer epidemic of today. We only need to go back to our old and traditional ways of having wars all the time, with conscription of people and confiscation of land and food for the armies, causing famines. That makes so much sense than the current system of having wars all the time in other countries and poisoning our own people to keep the growth down.
Then, the most important aspect to all this is that all solutions must be nipped in the bud. As Thomas Sowell reasoned "There are no solutions, only compromises." Which actually means that if someone were to find a way of creating electricity 100 times cheaper than today and without contamination, such that heavy industry (steel) would begin using electricity instead of coal, thus creatively destroying the carbon and petrol industry, which would make more expensive the production of petrol derived chemicals; then we have to make the compromise of keeping up the system even if that means wreaking havoc everywhere. Solutions must not be allowed, not once, not ever, in anything.
Too good to be true. It is probably false. Like the idea that all contagious diseases caused by microbes were invented to never discover and then solve the problems of contamination. It has to be false. Otherwise, we would be even worse than we think we are.
The great cover up.
Curiously enough, this cover up also benefits the ecologists and the natural health practitioners. They also want a stable business. They want power over humans, too. Like normal doctors. They need to control information and to scare people to keep them bound, so that they never seek a solution. There are no easy solutions allowed in environmentalism or in natural medicine. Otherwise, people would flourish and become free, making our business unpredictable. And there would be a growth in human population, which is bad for the environment by definition. Environment good humans bad!
The corrupt side of the natural health world and ecologism or environmentalism benefits, parasitically, of the corruption of the system. Fortunately enough, the system wants to kill them too. There can be no competition. The system is following a deparasitation protocol.
From a Plutonian perspective, this is all a lot of fun. The people who want to heal the world and make everyone free seem to be working for the enemy, and they don't know about it.
If my reasoning in this extra-long comment are correct, then the subconscious sabotage and self-sabotage present in the victims of covid tyranny, me included, is one of the things that keep people anesthesized. What homeopathic preparation could I use to heal that sabotage, I wonder.
My tribe will not believe me when I tell them that their beloved IVM was another con. My compassionate side tells me "Don't say a word. They are already irritated about the possibility growing in their thinking that SARS and COVID may have never been real. Let them process that slowly. Nothing to win." I think that's my Venus and my Pallas in Pisces advising my Mars in Scorpio to be prudent.
Maybe I choose to believe again in covid and ivm and the rebel doctors. That seems to be an easier life. The blue pill for Cipher. But I don't like to betray people, as Cipher did in the Matrix. I only like to study humans betraying each other, as someone who enjoys studying a work of art.
In reality, all the corruption of humans can be studied as a work of art. Treason is a theme that repeats too much. I prefer to study other forms of corruption, like sophistry and war. There is no much treason in sophistry and war, because the participants distrust each other ab initio.